Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42894387›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026

Systematic benchmarking of multi-ancestry fine-mapping under variant heterogeneity and LD mismatch.

Guangxin Chen, Peristera Paschou, Boran Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guangxin ChenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, 915 Mitch Daniels Boulevard, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-3368-906X
Peristera PaschouDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, 915 Mitch Daniels Boulevard, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.
Boran GaoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, 915 Mitch Daniels Boulevard, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8620-0534

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasingly diverse, multi-ancestry genome-wide association studies (GWASs) provide unprecedented opportunities to better understand the genetic architecture of complex traits. In particular, differences in linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns across populations can be leveraged to improve the resolution and reliability of statistical fine-mapping. However, cross-ancestry effect heterogeneity, population-specific variant support, and LD mismatches pose substantial challenges, motivating a systematic evaluation of multi-ancestry fine-mapping methods to provide practical guidance for analyses across diverse populations. We conducted a comprehensive benchmarking of nine methods, spanning joint probabilistic models that explicitly model cross-ancestry LD and effect sharing, and univariate-based integration approaches that aggregate ancestry-specific results. We evaluated fine-mapping accuracy, robustness, and computational efficiency using realistic simulations derived from UK Biobank genotype data, with real-data validation in the All of Us Research Program. Our study revealed that joint modeling approaches achieve improved power and resolution for causal variants shared across populations. In comparison, post-hoc integration is more robust in recovering causal variants present in only a subset of populations by accommodating differences in variant availability. Moreover, methods are generally underpowered in the presence of systematic discrepancies between GWAS summary statistics and external LD reference panels. Motivated by these complementary performance profiles, we propose the multi-ancestry fine-mapping decision strategy, which avoids a priori method selection by adaptively selecting approaches based on locus-level evidence of ancestry-specific variants. Together, our benchmarking and decision strategy offer practical guidance for robust multi-ancestry fine-mapping and highlight the importance of joint modeling that effectively accounts for ancestry-specific variant availability and LD mismatch.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenome-Wide Association StudyLinkage DisequilibriumBenchmarkingGenetic VariationHumansModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotidebenchmarkingGWASlinkage disequilibriummulti-ancestry fine-mappingpopulation geneticsstatistical fine-mapping

Identifiers

PMID42894387
PMCPMC13677793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.