ReviewCancer science2026
Evolution of CAR-T Therapy: Functional Engineering, Manufacturing Innovation, and Future In Vivo Strategies.
Review in Cancer science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has transformed the treatment of hematologic malignancies and established a new paradigm for engineered cellular immunotherapy. However, its broader clinical application remains constrained by complex autologous manufacturing, high cost, limited scalability, variable product quality, suboptimal efficacy in solid tumors, and treatment-related toxicities. To address these challenges, recent advances in CAR-T cell therapy can be viewed across four interconnected dimensions: functional engineering, manufacturing innovation, alternative cell sources, and in vivo CAR programming. Functional engineering includes cytokine-armored, checkpoint-resistant, multi-targeting, and modular or switchable CAR platforms designed to enhance efficacy, persistence, and safety. In parallel, manufacturing innovations such as shortened culture protocols, automated closed systems, and preservation of less differentiated T-cell states aim to improve product potency while reducing production time and complexity. Alternative cell sources, including allogeneic donor-derived and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived platforms, may further enable standardized, scalable, and potentially off-the-shelf therapies. Finally, in vivo CAR programming has emerged as a fourth dimension in which endogenous immune cells are directly engineered within patients using viral or non-viral gene delivery systems. This review summarizes these interconnected advances and discusses how they may collectively shape the next generation of CAR-based immune therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.