ReviewCardiovascular ultrasound2026
Time-aligned segmental strain as a diagnostic marker for obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with chronic chest pain.
Review in Cardiovascular ultrasound, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyocardial strain curves provide valuable insights into coronary artery disease (CAD) beyond conventional peak strain measurements. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of time-aligned segmental strain and strain rate (S/SR) curves to identify obstructive CAD in consecutive chest pain patients.
methodsA total of 510 chest-pain patients referred to coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) were included. Segmental strain curves were time-aligned using aortic valve closure (AVC) and cardiac cycle length as reference points. Average S/SR curves were generated for 18 myocardial segments, establishing reference curves from a group of 314 chronic chest-pain patients without CAD (No-CAD). Deviations were defined based on thresholds of peak S/SR or average S/SR curve deviation over systole and the first half of diastole.
resultsSignificant differences were observed between groups, particularly between the revascularized MI, CABG, or 3-vessel CAD groups compared to the No-CAD group (p<0.05). ROC curve analysis demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for CABG patients (AUC up to 0.933), while the detection rate for PCI was limited (AUC < 0.7). Global longitudinal strain rate in early diastole (GLSR E) and segmental peak SR E showed the highest diagnostic accuracy. These findings confirm that time-aligned strain analysis improves the detection of significant CAD but remains limited for identifying patients with mild disease.
conclusionTime-aligned segmental strain analysis improved detection of high-grade disease requiring CABG but could not distinguish single-vessel from non-obstructive CAD. Pathological strain patterns became significant only in advanced CAD, indicating that segmental resting strain analysis has clinical utility primarily for identifying advanced CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.