Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42894223›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2026

3Rs principles for biomedical research in Africa: Evidence, challenges, early career researchers' perspectives, and pathways for One Health research governance.

Olawale F Olaniyan, Modou Dumbuya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olawale F OlaniyanUniversity of the Gambia, P.O. Box 3530, Serrekunda, The Gambia. of.olaniyan@utg.edu.gm.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0921-7797
Modou DumbuyaThe Gambia College, 79F5+WJ8, Brikama, The Gambia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement) are globally recognized as a cornerstone of ethical animal research and an essential component of responsible biomedical research systems. Nonetheless, evidence on the awareness, reporting, and implementation in African research settings remain limited. This study therefore examined integration of 3Rs principles in African biomedical research by assessing existing evidence, key challenges, and pathways forward. It also explored awareness of early career researchers concerning ethical animal use and the 3Rs principles, with a particular focus on The Gambia.

methodsA two-pronged approach was used. A structured literature search of the PubMed Central and EBSCOhost databases (2001-2022) was conducted using predefined search terms and Boolean operators to identify peer-reviewed studies from African countries that explicitly reported the 3Rs principles. Also, a cross-sectional survey was administered to 80 purposively selected early career researchers and professionals in The Gambia to assess awareness, training, and institutional support for ethical use of animals in research. Data were analysed using Fisher's exact test (p < 0.05) and the phi coefficient (Φ) to examine associations between selected demographic and training-related variables.

resultsSeven eligible studies explicitly mentioning the 3Rs were identified in six African countries. They mainly involved rodent models and focused on evaluating drug and nutrient efficacy, plant-based mitigation of toxicity, behavioural effects, antivenom evaluation, and environmental health risks. Nearly half involved transcontinental collaborations with researchers from Europe and the Americas. Survey findings showed important gaps in research ethics awareness, training, and institutional support. Most respondents (86%) were unfamiliar with the 3Rs principles, over 65% had not received formal training in research sample collection, and 63% reported absence of institutional protocols or policies governing ethical animal experimentation. Education level was significantly associated with prior training on sample collection from animals (p = 0.01; Φ = 0.341), underscoring the importance of strengthening capacity development, institutional oversight, and research governance within health research systems.

conclusionLimited awareness, reporting, and implementation of the 3Rs principles in African biomedical research point to important gaps in research capacity, governance, and ethical oversight. Strengthening institutional support, training, and regulatory frameworks are essential for advancing responsible research practices and strengthening One Health research systems. Findings from The Gambia provide valuable insights into broader African challenges and opportunities for improvement.

Indexed as

Animal ExperimentationAnimal Use AlternativesBiomedical ResearchEthics, ResearchResearch PersonnelAcademiaAfricaAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesGambiaHumans3Rs principlesAfricaAnimal experimentationAnimal welfareBiomedical researchHumane treatmentResearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID42894223
PMCPMC13678922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.