ArticleBMC medical education2026
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Indonesian version of the operating room educational environment measure with Indonesian residents.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAssessing residents' perceptions of the operating room (OR) educational environment is critical for shaping competencies in surgical training and influencing learning outcomes, professional development, and patient safety. Evaluation of these perceptions provides evidence of the effectiveness of teaching, supervision, and teamwork in supporting learning in the OR and helps educators identify areas for improvement in residency programs. The Operating Room Educational Environment Measure (OREEM) is an instrument developed to evaluate learning conditions in the OR. In this study, we aimed to assess the validity, reliability, and cross-cultural applicability of the Indonesian version of the OREEM questionnaire adapted to Indonesian surgical residents.
methodsThe original 40-item OREEM was translated into Bahasa Indonesia using a standardized forward and backward translation procedure. Eight experts in surgical education assessed content relevance and clarity based on a contemporary conceptual framework comprising 5 themes and 26 subthemes. The content validity ratio (CVR) and item-level content validity index (I-CVI) were calculated using ratings from 26 experts. Construct validity was examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with Varimax rotation based on responses from 244 residents. Internal consistency reliability was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha and corrected item-total correlations.
resultsThirty-nine items were retained for the final Indonesian version of the OREEM. A total of 21 items exceeded the CVR threshold (≥ 0.37), and 22 achieved acceptable I-CVI values (≥ 0.79). EFA supported a three-factor structure-Teaching and Atmosphere, Learning Opportunities and Workload, and Training, Skills, and Supervision-accounting for 32.34% of the total variance. The overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.887, with 84.6% of items demonstrating corrected item-total correlations above 0.30.
conclusionsThe 39-item Indonesian version of the OREEM demonstrated acceptable validity and high internal consistency, suggesting its potential utility as a valid instrument for assessing residents' perceptions of the OR learning environment in Indonesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.