ArticleBMC palliative care2026
End-of-life experiences: a multicenter longitudinal study on characteristics and prevalence in terminally ill patients.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence suggests that transcendent end-of-life experiences (ELEs) are common and impact the dying; however, there is a shortage of longitudinal studies.
objectivesTo evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of ELEs in terminally ill patients.
methodsThis multicenter longitudinal mixed‑methods study collected demographic, clinical, and ELE‑related data-including prevalence, content, and comfort/distress ratings-from patients with a Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) ≤ 50% across three palliative care units in Brazil. Data were gathered through repeated interviews until death, discharge, or ongoing hospitalization by the study's end. Descriptive statistics were performed.
resultsAmong 85 patients, 52% were female (44) and mean age was 61 (range 28-93); religiosity/spirituality was common (63% moderately/very religious, 98% believed in God, 65% in afterlife). Functional status declined progressively during follow‑up, with mean PPS decreasing from approximately 40 early in observation to 10 near death. ELEs were reported across varying levels of impairment. Of these patients, 34% experienced ELEs, with a median interval of 29.5 days from the first ELE to death (range: 1-186 days). Nearly half of the ELEs (49%) occurred during sleep, and 80% were perceived as real. The majority of ELEs involved deceased loved ones (52%), with 36% being described as comforting and 27% as distressing. Additionally, 78% of ELEs were reported by non-delirious patients.
conclusionsELEs exhibited consistent patterns in timing, phenomenology, and content, supporting the possibility that they represent an inherent feature of the dying process. Cultural and psychosocial contexts may shape both the interpretation of ELEs and their emotional valence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.