ArticleBMC psychology2026
Cross-sectional association among passive social media use, peer attachment security, and restrained eating among Chinese college women: incorporating the sociocultural and attachment perspectives.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRestrained eating has often been studied from either sociocultural or attachment perspectives, but relatively few studies have examined how attachment-related factors may operate alongside sociocultural influences. Additionally, most studies have focused on Western populations, despite evidence suggesting that sociocultural influences on eating behaviors vary across cultures. Guided by both sociocultural and attachment theories, the present study examined how passive social media use and peer attachment security were related to restrained eating among Chinese college women, and whether thin-ideal internalization and body satisfaction mediated these associations.
methodsData were collected from 404 Chinese college women aged 18-30 through Wenjuanxing, a widely used online survey platform in China. Participants completed the Chinese version of the Surveillance Use Scale, the Ideal-Body Internalization Scale, the Body Image State Scale, and the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment.
resultsA moderated mediation model revealed that passive social media use, peer attachment security, and their interaction were significantly associated with restrained eating, with different mediating mechanisms. First, passive social media use was directly associated with restrained eating. Second, peer attachment security was indirectly associated with restrained eating through body satisfaction. Importantly, the interactive effect of passive social media use and attachment was directly associated with restrained eating. Specifically, this effect was significant only for individuals with low levels of peer attachment security.
conclusionsBy integrating selected sociocultural pathways and attachment perspectives within a non-Western context, this study offers a nuanced understanding of restrained eating among Chinese college women. Findings suggest that passive social media use and peer attachment security function through distinct mechanisms. Moreover, the effect of passive social media use is contingent on peer attachment security, suggesting that interpersonal resources may buffer vulnerability to digital environmental pressures. The findings highlight the importance of considering both digital experiences and interpersonal relationships when examining eating-related behaviors. Practically, interventions may benefit from promoting awareness of passive social media use while also fostering supportive peer relationships and positive body image.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.