ArticleRespiratory research2026
Technical safety and efficacy of PFA catheter electrode for airway ablation in a rat model of COPD.
Article in Respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by progressive airway obstruction. While current pharmacotherapies provide symptomatic relief, they fail to alter disease progression. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a promising non-thermal technology capable of inducing selective cell death and achieving long-term symptom relief in COPD. However, its clinical translation remains hindered by unclear mechanistic foundations and the lack of specialized preclinical devices necessary for detailed mechanistic studies. METHODS AND MATERIAL: We developed a novel PFA catheter specifically designed for rat airways, featuring a platinum-iridium electrode ring (inner diameter: 1.95 mm) integrated with a dual-lumen PVC tube (outer diameter: 1.80 mm) to enable continuous ventilation during ablation. Finite element modeling was employed to systematically evaluate electric field distributions and thermal effects across voltage parameters. Safety was assessed in healthy Sprague-Dawley rats through continuous monitoring of hemodynamic responses, respiratory parameters, and tissue temperature changes. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated in a cigarette smoke and Lipopolysaccharide-induced COPD model using histopathological analysis, pulmonary function tests, and arterial blood gas measurements at postoperative days 3 and 28.
resultsNumerical simulations demonstrated that increasing voltage (100-500 V) and pulse number proportionally expanded both the effective electric field distribution and ablation depth in airway walls, with no thermal injury observed within this range. In vivo validation confirmed that parameters of 200-300 V with 60-90 pulses achieved effective mucosal ablation, inducing epithelial necrosis and sloughing while preserving submucosal and cartilaginous structures without transmural damage. Vital signs monitoring revealed transient, self-resolving arrhythmias and hypotension. In COPD models, PFA treatment significantly reduced goblet cell hyperplasia and inflammation, restored normal epithelial architecture, and improved both pulmonary function and gas exchange.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that an easily fabricated PFA catheter can achieve complete epithelial ablation without transmural or thermal injury using optimized parameters. The procedure produced significant therapeutic improvement through reduction of goblet cell hyperplasia and restoration of pulmonary function, providing a validated platform for further mechanistic exploration and advancing PFA as a precise, non-thermal therapy for COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.