ArticleBMC surgery2026
Workflow-oriented learning curve analysis of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: step-specific associations of operative maturation.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe learning curve of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has traditionally been assessed using global operative indicators such as operative time and blood loss. However, little is known about how technical performance evolves during individual operative steps. This study aimed to perform a workflow-oriented learning curve analysis of LDP using cumulative sum (CUSUM) methodology and step-specific operative assessment.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 58 consecutive patients who underwent LDP between January 2023 and December 2025 at a high-volume pancreatic center. Operative workflow was divided into predefined operative steps according to anatomical landmarks. CUSUM analysis based on operative time was used to identify the transition from the initial phases to the proficiency phase.
resultsCUSUM analysis identified a transition point at approximately Case 29. Mean operative time decreased from 77 ± 13 min in the early phase to 54 ± 14 min in the late phase (P < 0.001). The steepest reductions occurred during pancreatic mobilization (31 ± 10 vs. 17 ± 6 min, P < 0.001) and splenic vessel dissection (24 ± 9 vs. 12 ± 4 min, P < 0.001). Estimated blood loss also declined significantly (39 ± 18 vs. 21 ± 11 mL, P = 0.002), while postoperative pancreatic fistula rates and overall complication rates remained comparable between phases.
conclusionsIn this cohort, reductions in operative time during LDP were concentrated in anatomically complex dissection steps rather than uniform acceleration of the entire procedure. Step-specific analysis describes temporal patterns that characterize technical change during minimally invasive pancreatic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.