Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42894147›Full record

Observational studyBMC public health2026

#KindnessbyPost: a pre-post, observational evaluation and feasibility study of a participatory public mental health intervention.

Marie Le Novere, Caroline S Clarke, Rebecca Jones, Katey Warran, Brynmor Lloyd-Evans, Luke Sheridan Rains

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marie Le NovereUCL Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Caroline S ClarkeUCL Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Rebecca JonesDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Katey WarranSchool of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Brynmor Lloyd-EvansDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Luke Sheridan RainsDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK. l.sheridanrains@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

UK Research and Innovation ES/S004440/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background#KindnessbyPost (KbP) is a "national kindness exchange". Participants send and receive a card by post to different, unknown people containing messages of good will. Previous evidence suggests participation in KbP may reduce loneliness and improve wellbeing. We evaluated the outcomes and administrative costs of KbP and explored the feasibility of collecting health economic measures for future research.

methodsWe used a pre-post, observational study design. Participants in two separate KbP exchanges in 2021 were invited to complete an online questionnaire. It included self-reported measures quantifying psychological wellbeing and loneliness, capability, and healthcare service use. Data were collected at three time-points per exchange: exchange-start (baseline), exchange-end (2 weeks), and 3 months post-exchange. Administrative cost data were obtained from the KbP programme organisers.

resultsAcross both exchanges, 1,285 responses were received from 1,142 participants. 143 participants completed questionnaires at both exchanges. In total, 623 (48%) participants completed follow-ups at exchange-end, and 414 (32%) at 3 months post-exchange. 70% (n = 789) of participants were aged between 31 and 60 years. 94% (n = 1,075) of participants were female and 95% (n = 1,078) were of white ethnicity. Compared to baseline, loneliness reduced and wellbeing increased at exchange end (change in loneliness = ‑0.21 units, 95% CI: -0.29 to -0.12; change in wellbeing = 0.68 units, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.88, respectively) and at 3 months post-exchange (loneliness change = -0.40 units, 95% CI: -0.50 to -0.30; wellbeing change = 1.01 units, 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.25, respectively). Capability scores (mean (SD) were calculated at baseline: 0.74 (0.18); exchange-end: 0.75 (0.19); and 3 months: 0.76 (0.18)) from available responses. The average administrative cost of delivering the intervention was £0.67-£0.87 per participant, not including in-kind contributions.

conclusionsWe observed a small, sustained improvement to people's wellbeing and loneliness following participation in a KbP exchange. Given the study design, causal attribution to KbP is uncertain. However, our results are consistent with previous evaluations and offer preliminary evidence that KbP may be an effective mental wellbeing intervention. Given its low administrative cost and highly scalable design, KbP could also be a cost-effective intervention for improving public mental health, warranting definitive evaluation of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in future. Our study also demonstrated the feasibility of collecting wellbeing and health economic outcome measures needed for future research.

Indexed as

LonelinessMental HealthPsychosocial InterventionAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationPsychological Well-BeingSurveys and QuestionnairesActs of KindnessEvaluationHealth EconomicsLonelinessSocial IsolationWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID42894147
PMCPMC13679209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.