ReviewTropical animal health and production2026
Horticultural wastes as sustainable alternative feed resources for livestock: processing technologies, nutritional value, and animal performance.
Review in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid expansion of the horticulture sector has resulted in the generation of substantial quantities of fruit and vegetable waste, posing environmental and waste disposal challenges. The improper disposal of these residues may contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, environmental pollution, and loss of potentially valuable nutrients. Concurrently, the rising cost and increasing demand for conventional feed resources have intensified the exploration of sustainable and economical alternatives for livestock and poultry feeding systems. This review examines the potential of horticultural waste and by-products as alternative feed resources in livestock and poultry production systems, with emphasis on their nutritional characteristics, processing technologies, dietary inclusion levels, and effects on animal performance and health. Fruit and vegetable by-products such as avocado residues, mango residues, tomato pomace, watermelon rinds, cabbage, carrots, cauliflower, cucumbers, potato residues, mushroom waste and pumpkin seed meal have been evaluated as feed ingredients at different inclusion levels and through different processing approaches. The reported effects vary considerably depending on the animal species, by-product type and composition, processing technique, dietary formulation and inclusion level. While several studies have reported improvements or no adverse effects on growth performance, feed efficiency, milk production, nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation and gut health at appropriate inclusion levels, other studies have reported reduced drymatter intake, average daily gain, digestibility, body weight or carcass characteristics at higher or unsuitable inclusion levels. Processing methods such as drying, ensiling, fermentation and pelleting can improve storage characteristics and may modify nutrient availability, but their effectiveness is also material and process specific. Therefore, the use of horticultural by-products requires careful consideration of species-specific responses, nutritional composition, processing conditions, inclusion limits and feed safety risks. Overall, horticultural waste represents a promising complementary feed resource with potential environmental and economic benefits, although its practical utilization should be guided by evidence based, species and diet specific inclusion strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42894081What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.