Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42894070›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2026

National trends in dual de-escalation of axillary surgery and adjuvant radiation in early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer.

Dylan S Brokaw, Leonardo Kozian, Cecilia Chang, Rebecca M Shulman, Richard J Bleicher, Alycia So, Allison A Aggon, Austin D Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dylan S BrokawDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, c308, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
Leonardo KozianDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, c308, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
Cecilia ChangResearch Institute, Endeavor Health, Evanston, IL, USA.
Rebecca M ShulmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Richard J BleicherDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, c308, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
Alycia SoDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, c308, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
Allison A AggonDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, c308, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
Austin D WilliamsDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, c308, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA. austin.williams@fccc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDe-escalation has become standard across breast cancer management. Many early-stage HR+/HER2-negative breast cancers are eligible for both SLNB omission and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). However, the oncologic safety of dual de-escalation has not been evaluated except in patients ≥ 70 years. We sought to characterize national practice patterns and factors associated with adoption of this dual de-escalation approach.

methodsWomen aged 50-69 years with clinical T1-T2N0 breast cancer who underwent upfront breast-conserving surgery between (2012 - 2022) were identified from the National Cancer Database. Patients were categorized by axillary surgery and by adjuvant radiation modality (WBI, APBI, or none). We assessed trends and factors associated with de-escalation.

results316,324 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 98% underwent SLNB. Among patients who underwent SLNB, 83% received WBI, 11% received APBI, and 6% received no radiation. In contrast, among patients in whom SLNB was omitted, 63% received WBI, 8% received APBI, and 30% received no radiation. SLNB omission remained low throughout the study period at < 3%, while APBI use increased from 8% to 16.5%. Dual de-escalation was rarely performed throughout the study period remaining < 0.30%. Shared predictors of de-escalation included cT1 tumors, ductal histology, low grade, and treatment at academic/research programs.

conclusionThese findings highlight the need for prospective studies to define the safety, outcomes, and patient selection criteria for combined de-escalation strategies. Until these data are available, patient-centered discussions are essential to determine the most appropriate strategy for patients with low-risk disease.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAgedAxillaErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRadiotherapy, AdjuvantReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneAPBIAxillary surgeryBreast cancerDe-escalationPractice patternsSLNB omission

Identifiers

PMID42894070
PMCPMC13677617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.