ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2026
Diagnosis-to-surgery lead time and future-health worry in women with primary breast cancer: a longitudinal Swedish registry-based cohort study.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe interval between breast cancer diagnosis and surgery is psychologically demanding, and meeting the Swedish standardised care pathway target has remained challenging. We examined whether diagnosis-to-surgery lead time is associated with patient-reported psychological outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a longitudinal cohort study using Swedish National Quality Register for Breast Cancer data (2020-2024). The cohort comprised 2,906 women with primary invasive breast cancer undergoing surgery, with patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) data at baseline (n = 2,906), 6 months (n = 2,638), and 12 months (n = 2,678). Lead time from biopsy to surgery was modelled continuously (per 1 SD ≈ 19 days). The primary outcome was worry about future health (EORTC QLQ-BR23 item 43); secondary outcomes were general worry, tension, depressed mood, and overall quality of life. Associations were estimated using mixed-effects cumulative link models adjusted for clinical and tumour factors, pandemic era, patient, and healthcare region.
resultsMedian lead time was 32 days (IQR 23-42). Longer lead time was associated with greater worry about future health (adjusted OR 1.15 per SD, 95% CI 1.04-1.27), while associations with the secondary outcomes were smaller and not statistically significant. At baseline, high future-health worry was more common with lead times > 35 vs. ≤ 35 days (42.2% vs. 35.1%).
conclusionLonger diagnosis-to-surgery lead time was associated with greater future-health worry, with smaller, non-significant associations for general distress and quality of life. The findings highlight the preoperative waiting period as a potential context for improved communication about expected timelines and reasons for delay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.