Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42894052›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2026

Cost-effective and efficient diagnosis of bovine theileriosis in a low-income setting.

Sakunika Amarasinghe, Menaka Marasinghe, P Gajavathany, Jeyathadchayini Pathmathas, Rupika S Rajakaruna, Piyumali K Perera

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sakunika AmarasinghePostgraduate Institute of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4932-435X
Menaka MarasingheDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3168-0005
P GajavathanyDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Jaffna, Thirunelvely, Sri Lanka.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3599-3861
Jeyathadchayini PathmathasVeterinary Surgeon Office, Jaffna, Tellipalai, Sri Lanka.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5635-1481
Rupika S RajakarunaDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7939-947X
Piyumali K PereraPostgraduate Institute of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. piyumali.perera@sci.pdn.ac.lk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2441-9028

Funding

Postgraduate Institute of Science, University of Peradeniya PGIS/2022/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sample pooling combined with conventional polymerase chain reaction (cPCR) is a rapid and cost-effective approach for herd-level detection of Theileria spp., particularly in resource-limited settings. Bovine theileriosis is a tick-borne protozoan disease causing major economic losses to livestock production worldwide. In Sri Lanka, particularly in Jaffna, Theileria infections threaten cattle productivity, highlighting the need for affordable and sensitive surveillance tools. This study evaluated pooled cPCR for herd-level detection of Theileria spp. in cattle from three farms in Jaffna. Sixty blood samples (27, 26, and 7 animals per farm) and 27 ticks were collected. Giemsa-stained blood smears and individual cPCR analyses were performed. Then, three pools were prepared, taking 200 µL from each sample (one pool per farm) and analysed using cPCR targeting the major piroplasm surface protein (MPSP) gene. Microscopy detected a prevalence of 50%, whereas cPCR detected 81.7% (χ² = 13.374, p = 0.0003). Both Theileria orientalis (types 5 and 7) and Theileria sp. Yokoyama were identified. Pooling before cPCR and genomic DNA extraction reduced diagnostic costs by approximately 12-fold. Tick identification revealed predominance of Haemaphysalis bispinosa (88%). No significant associations were observed between infection prevalence and age, sex, or farm location. Despite widespread infection, most cattle were clinically healthy, indicating extensive subclinical circulation and possible endemic stability. Contrary to expectations, pooling samples from up to 27 cattle remained effective in herd-level detection of Theileria spp. despite low-parasitaemia levels. These findings demonstrate that pooled cPCR is a reliable and economical strategy for large-scale surveillance of bovine theileriosis in endemic, high prevalent and resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

Polymerase Chain ReactionTheileriaTheileriasisAnimalsCattleCost-Benefit AnalysisPooled TestingPrevalenceProtozoan ProteinsSri LankaTicksProtozoan ProteinsCattleCost-effectivePooled cPCR analysisTheileria annulataTheileria orientalis

Identifiers

PMID42894052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.