ArticleAnnals of hematology2026
Safety of red blood cell transfusion despite serologic incompatibility in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: A real-world multicenter study.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Red blood cell transfusion in Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (AIHA) poses significant clinical challenges due to pan-reactive autoantibodies that interfere with cross-matching, often raising concerns regarding the safety of transfusing serologically "incompatible" blood. This retrospective multicenter study evaluated the frequency, management criteria, and safety profile of red blood cell transfusions in a cohort of adult patients affected by AIHA with a specific focus on transfusion management in the setting of serologic incompatibility. We analyzed 93 adult patients diagnosed with AIHA at two hematology referral centers in Palermo, Italy, between 2020 and 2025. Transfusion support was required in 31.2% (N = 29) of patients. Decisions were mainly guided by a "double trigger" of low hemoglobin (mean 6.3 g/dL) and symptoms of tissue hypoxia, rather than by fixed hemoglobin thresholds. Notably, 61.1% of characterized units were serologically "incompatible" due to autoantibodies. Despite this, the adverse reaction rate was extremely low (1.2% per unit), with no hemolytic reactions recorded. This safety profile was likely supported by concomitant immunosuppressive therapy (89.6% of transfused patients), acting as "biological premedication". Splenomegaly was identified as a marker for higher transfusion dependence (41.2% vs. 29.5%). Transfusion in AIHA is a safe and effective life-saving measure when managed with appropriate immunohematological oversight. Red blood cell transfusion in AIHA appears safe and effective when clinically indicated and managed with appropriate immunohematologic oversight, even in the presence of persistent serologic incompatibility. Transfusion support should not be delayed solely because of crossmatch incompatibility once clinically significant alloantibodies have been reasonably excluded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.