Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42894011›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

TasTY: Development and evaluation of a taste test for quantifying taste sensitivity among preschool children-test-retest reliability, application, and comparison between children with and without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Johannes Weißenfeld, Christoph Maier, Christine H Meyer-Frießem, Anna Teresa Hoffmann, Thomas Lücke, Anne Schlegtendal

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johannes WeißenfeldUniversity Children's Hospital, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Christoph MaierUniversity Children's Hospital, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Christine H Meyer-FrießemDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, KLW St. Paulus GmbH St. Marien Hospital Lünen, Lünen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8743-2065
Anna Teresa HoffmannUniversity Children's Hospital, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Thomas LückeUniversity Children's Hospital, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Anne SchlegtendalUniversity Children's Hospital, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. Anne.Schlegtendal@ruhr-uni-bochum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taste dysfunction gained attention during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic; however, validated objective tests for preschool children remain limited. We aimed to develop a feasible, reliable test quantifying taste sensitivity among children aged 3-6 years and to compare performance between children with and without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. We included 68 symptom-free children (median age 5.1 years; interquartile range (IQR) 3.9-5.9): 36 without known SARS-CoV-2 infection (control group, CG) and 32 with confirmed prior infection (SARS-CoV-2 infection group, C19-G), tested 79 days after infection (median; IQR 56-112). Children completed a self-developed Taste Test for Young Children (TasTY), a double-blind, playful two-alternative forced-choice test with 10 samples in randomized order (sweet, sour, and salty at three concentrations each; water served as a control). Twenty controls were retested a median of 62 days later (IQR 38-64). Outcomes were total score (0-10), feasibility, task comprehension, and test-retest reliability, assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and smallest real difference (SRD). Feasibility was high (3% dropout), and 89.4% correctly classified water. Total score test-retest reliability was good (ICC = 0.73; pooled SEM = 0.76; SRD = 2.11). Total scores were similar between CG and C19-G (8.37 ± 1.5 vs. 8.19 ± 1.5; p = 0.63). Descriptively, three-year-olds (n = 17) had lower, more variable scores.

conclusionTasTY provides an age-appropriate, reliable, objective method for quantifying taste sensitivity among preschoolers, supporting standardized group comparisons and longitudinal assessment. WHAT IS KNOWN: • COVID-19 increased awareness of taste dysfunction; however, evidence among young children relies mainly on surveys and parental reports. • Objective taste tests for preschool children remain limited. WHAT IS NEW: • TasTY is a feasible, standardized, and objective test for quantifying taste sensitivity among children aged 3-6 years and goes beyond parental and subjective reports. • Its standardized 0-10 score showed good test-retest reliability and may support group comparisons and longitudinal assessment of preschool children with taste-related conditions.

Indexed as

COVID-19TasteTaste DisordersChildChild, PreschoolDouble-Blind MethodFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePandemicsReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2Gustatory functionPreschool childrenSARS-CoV-2Taste sensitivityTaste testTest–retest reliability

Identifiers

PMID42894011
PMCPMC13677631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.