Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42894006›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Learning stochasticity via a nonparametric approach to state-dependent noise estimation.

G Pillonetto, A Giaretta, M Bisiacco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

G PillonettoDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. giapi@dei.unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9584-3323
A GiarettaDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
M BisiaccoDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modeling stochastic dynamical systems remains a central challenge across disciplines. Incomplete knowledge of nonlinear interactions and state-dependent fluctuations often renders bottom-up approaches ineffective, motivating methods that infer governing equations directly from data. However, parametric models struggle in the absence of strong prior assumptions, particularly when the intensity of the process noise depends on the system state. Here we introduce Trine (Three-phase Regression for INferred noisE), a nonparametric, kernel-based framework for inferring state-dependent noise from time-series data. The approach naturally extends to supervised learning settings with heteroskedastic noise. Trine employs a three-stage algorithm combining analytically solvable subproblems with a structured kernel architecture capable of capturing both abrupt stochastic fluctuations and smooth variations in variance. We validate Trine on biological and ecological systems, where it uncovers hidden dynamics without predefined parametric assumptions. Across benchmark systems, Trine achieves near-oracle performance, matching an idealized observer with direct access to the stochastic input realizations. On live-cell RNA transcription trajectories, Trine reveals localized regimes of elevated stochastic activity, demonstrating how effective state-dependent diffusion models can uncover biologically meaningful hidden variability directly from experimental observations. The Trine framework thus opens new avenues for quantifying how process noise shapes the behavior of complex dynamical systems.

Identifiers

PMID42894006
PMCPMC13677740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.