Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42893902›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Valid Inference for Two Sample Summary Statistics Mendelian Randomization.

Kai Wang, Grace Z Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kai WangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3229-9866
Grace Z WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Pulmonary Toxicology Facility CoreP30ES005605 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Brandi Janssen · 1990 to 2026
$40.5M
Environmental Health Sciences Research Center P30 ES005605NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mendelian randomization (MR) studies increasingly rely on summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWASs). However, current summary-data methods treat marginal GWAS effect estimates as independent across instrumental single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which holds only when the SNPs have no effect. Without imposing this independence assumption, we derive expressions for the two-stage least squares (TSLS), two-sample TSLS (TSTSLS), and generalized method-of-moments estimators together with their variance estimators using only GWAS summary statistics, assuming the instrumental SNPs are in linkage equilibrium. We show that the widely used inverse-variance weighted (IVW) estimator is generally not equivalent to either TSLS or TSTSLS, contrary to a common claim in the MR literature. We further demonstrate that the conventional IVW standard error is generally inconsistent and provide a consistent alternative. Extensive simulations confirm the theoretical results and reveal that Wald confidence intervals based on summary statistics can be anti-conservative. An application to publicly available GWAS summary statistics on body mass index and systolic blood pressure illustrates the practical implications of the proposed methodology.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyMendelian Randomization AnalysisBlood PressureBody Mass IndexComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansLeast-Squares AnalysisModels, StatisticalPolymorphism, Single Nucleotidegeneralized method of momentsinverse‐variance weightingMendelian randomizationsummary statisticstwo‐stage least‐squares regression

Identifiers

PMID42893902
PMCPMC13677446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.