Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42893801›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2026

Evaluating Darbepoetin Treatment Strategies for Managing Anaemia in Haemodialysis Patients: Effects on All-Cause Mortality From a Target Trial Emulation Using Electronic Health Record Data.

Kate Birnie, Fergus J Caskey, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Dorothea Nitsch, Anna Casula, Eleanor J Murray, Jonathan A C Sterne

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kate BirniePopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9083-4097
Fergus J CaskeyPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Yoav Ben-ShlomoPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6648-3007
Dorothea NitschDepartment of Noncommunicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5767-248X
Anna CasulaUK Renal Registry, Bristol, UK.
Eleanor J MurrayBoston University, School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0043-4901
Jonathan A C SternePopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K021699/1National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration WestNIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnaemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease, often treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), but the optimal haemoglobin (Hb) target remains uncertain. Using electronic health records, we emulated a target trial comparing different Hb targets in haemodialysis patients to estimate their effects on mortality.

methodsWe used electronic health records from UK kidney centres reporting to the UK Renal Registry. Adults aged ≥ 18 years, receiving haemodialysis for ≥ 3 months, and without marked ESA resistance were eligible. Using the clone-censor-weight method, we emulated trials comparing Hb targets: (1) 105-125 versus 95-115 g/L and (2) 125-145 versus 95-115 g/L. Darbepoetin dosing followed a standardised protocol with predefined dose adjustments and a maximum dose of 150 μg/week. The outcome was all-cause mortality over 8 months.

resultsThe study included 8628 patients from 10 centres between 2004 and 2016; 62% male, median age 66 years (IQR 52-76). At baseline, mean Hb was 97.7 g/L (SD 15.1), and 79% of patients were receiving darbepoetin. The hazard ratio for mortality was 0.92 (95% CI 0.75-1.12) for the 105-125 versus 95-115 g/L comparison, and 1.20 (95% CI 0.94-1.54) for the 125-145 versus 95-115 g/L comparison. Adherence to the highest Hb target was lower, limiting precision.

conclusionsTargeting an Hb range of 105-125 g/L under controlled ESA dosing was not associated with increased mortality compared with 95-115 g/L. Targeting Hb levels above 125 g/L may increase mortality risk, consistent with previous trial findings.

Indexed as

AnemiaDarbepoetin alfaHematinicsRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAgedDose-Response Relationship, DrugElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHemoglobinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesUnited KingdomDarbepoetin alfaHematinicsHemoglobinsanaemiaelectronic health recordserythropoiesis stimulating agentshaemodialysistarget trial

Identifiers

PMID42893801
PMCPMC13677213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.