ArticleJournal of environmental quality
Biosolids in Washington State: Putting per- and poly-fluorinated alkyl substances concerns into a real-world context.
Article in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biosolids in Washington State: Putting per- and poly-fluorinated alkyl substances concerns into a real-world context.Journal of environmental qualityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Washington State has a history of beneficial use of municipal biosolids. The Department of Ecology recently conducted a voluntary survey of per- and poly-fluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) in biosolids. Results of that survey are presented and compared with the results from mandatory sampling in Michigan. For the majority of the utilities that participated, residential flow was found to be the primary source of PFAS for biosolids suggesting that industrial source control will not limit their presence in biosolids. Distribution of PFAS was similar to that identified in the Michigan sampling. The results of the sampling were put into the context of current biosolids end use to evaluate the potential for increased human exposure to PFAS as a consequence of beneficial use of biosolids. This was done in the context of identifying the potential for a highly exposed individual (HEI) as is traditionally done in risk assessment and was recently done in a draft Environmental Protection Agency risk assessment. The majority of end use sites; dryland wheat and commercial tree plantations, show no realistic potential for a HEI. Others, such as garden vegetables and animal feed crops, have identified exposure pathways and may merit additional sampling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.