Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42893409›Full record

ArticleJournal of environmental quality

Biosolids in Washington State: Putting per- and poly-fluorinated alkyl substances concerns into a real-world context.

Sally Brown, Scott Mansell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sally BrownSchool of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9405-571X
Scott MansellResearch and Innovation Division, Clean Water Services, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Funding

NW BiosolidsResource Recovery, King County, WA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Washington State has a history of beneficial use of municipal biosolids. The Department of Ecology recently conducted a voluntary survey of per- and poly-fluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) in biosolids. Results of that survey are presented and compared with the results from mandatory sampling in Michigan. For the majority of the utilities that participated, residential flow was found to be the primary source of PFAS for biosolids suggesting that industrial source control will not limit their presence in biosolids. Distribution of PFAS was similar to that identified in the Michigan sampling. The results of the sampling were put into the context of current biosolids end use to evaluate the potential for increased human exposure to PFAS as a consequence of beneficial use of biosolids. This was done in the context of identifying the potential for a highly exposed individual (HEI) as is traditionally done in risk assessment and was recently done in a draft Environmental Protection Agency risk assessment. The majority of end use sites; dryland wheat and commercial tree plantations, show no realistic potential for a HEI. Others, such as garden vegetables and animal feed crops, have identified exposure pathways and may merit additional sampling.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringFluorocarbonsSoil PollutantsWashingtonFluorocarbonsSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID42893409
PMCPMC13676804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.