Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42893392›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Immunogenicity of the Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Vaccine Administered During Pregnancy: Protocol for a Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Agustina Mazzoni, Ariel Bardach, Mabel Berrueta, Agustin Ciapponi, Karen Klein, Martin Brizuela, Carolina Nigri, Noelia Castellana, Jamile Ballivian, Juan Manuel Sambade and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Agustina MazzoniInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Lavalleja 856, Buenos Aires, C1414DTR, Argentina, 54 0111558570687.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3328-2705
Ariel BardachInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Lavalleja 856, Buenos Aires, C1414DTR, Argentina, 54 0111558570687.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4437-0073
Mabel BerruetaInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Lavalleja 856, Buenos Aires, C1414DTR, Argentina, 54 0111558570687.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7915-5643
Agustin CiapponiInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Lavalleja 856, Buenos Aires, C1414DTR, Argentina, 54 0111558570687.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5142-6122
Karen KleinInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Lavalleja 856, Buenos Aires, C1414DTR, Argentina, 54 0111558570687.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4619-5432
Martin BrizuelaInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Lavalleja 856, Buenos Aires, C1414DTR, Argentina, 54 0111558570687.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2113-449X
Carolina NigriInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Lavalleja 856, Buenos Aires, C1414DTR, Argentina, 54 0111558570687.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6689-514X
Noelia CastellanaInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Lavalleja 856, Buenos Aires, C1414DTR, Argentina, 54 0111558570687.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2937-0835
Jamile BallivianInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Lavalleja 856, Buenos Aires, C1414DTR, Argentina, 54 0111558570687.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2495-8040
Juan Manuel SambadeInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Lavalleja 856, Buenos Aires, C1414DTR, Argentina, 54 0111558570687.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6277-2469
Katharina StegelmannInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Lavalleja 856, Buenos Aires, C1414DTR, Argentina, 54 0111558570687.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3427-0630
Divya PatelMedical Evidence Development, Research & Development, Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-0288-1115
Jessica E AtwellMaternal Immunization Team, Global Medical Affairs, Pfizer (United States), New York, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1169-6456
Jennifer DeeseMedical Evidence Development, Research & Development, Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1535-1076
Sarah N CoxMedical Evidence Development, Research & Development, Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2447-0504
Lu WangStatistical Research and Data Science Center, Data Sciences and Analytics, Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9531-6086
Xu XiongDepartment of Epidemiology, Celia Scott Weatherhead School of Public Health, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9292-5059
Andy StergachisDepartments of Pharmacy and Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0057-6627
Flor M MunozDepartments of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0457-7689
Pierre BuekensDepartment of Epidemiology, Celia Scott Weatherhead School of Public Health, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4294-8559

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of lower respiratory tract disease in infants, with the highest burden in the first 6 months of life. Maternal immunization with the bivalent (RSV-A and RSV-B) prefusion F (RSVPreF) protein subunit vaccine (ABRYSVO) is a recently recommended strategy for preventing RSV-related outcomes in infants. First licensed for use in pregnancy in 2023, the RSVPreF vaccine demonstrated efficacy in a single pivotal randomized trial (Maternal Immunization Study for Safety and Efficacy; MATISSE); postlicensure real-world evidence on vaccine effectiveness across settings, seasons, and subgroups and on antibody durability and transplacental transfer remains limited and has not been synthesized in a continuously updated framework, motivating this review. Objective: This living systematic review and meta-analysis will synthesize emerging postlicensure data on the efficacy, effectiveness, and immunogenicity of the RSVPreF vaccine in real-world settings. Methods: We will conduct, in real time, a living systematic review and meta-analysis following Cochrane methods and PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols) guidance, including randomized clinical trials and postlicensure real-world studies (eg, cohort, case-control, test-negative, and quasi-experimental studies). Primary objectives are evaluation of vaccine efficacy and effectiveness in preventing RSV-specific and all-cause respiratory disease and immunogenicity in infants and pregnant individuals. Vaccine effectiveness outcomes include RSV laboratory-confirmed infection, RSV acute respiratory illness, RSV lower respiratory tract disease, RSV hospitalization, RSV complications, all-cause lower respiratory tract disease and hospitalization, and antibiotic use in infants with RSV infection. Immunogenicity outcomes include maternal neutralizing antibody titers, maternal-infant transfer ratios, infant titers over time, and RSV viral load. We will search MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, Chinese biomedical and citation databases, clinical trial registries from January 2023 onward with no language restrictions, updating at least monthly. Two investigators will independently select studies, extract data, and assess risk of bias. Adjusted estimates will be standardized to vaccine efficacy and effectiveness. Certainty will be graded using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Results: This living systematic review was funded in June 2025. Searches began in January 2023 and will continue with surveillance updates at least monthly until April 2028. As of January 2026, 837 records were screened, 105 (12.5%) were assessed in full text, and 12 (1.4%) met the inclusion criteria, of which 10 (1.2%) contributed extractable data. Data collection and analysis are ongoing and displayed on an interactive dashboard. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences, and a real-time dashboard, with the first effectiveness estimates available in July 2026. Conclusions: This living systematic review and meta-analysis will provide a continuously updated synthesis of real-world evidence on maternal RSVPreF vaccination to inform clinical and policy decisions.

Indexed as

Respiratory Syncytial Virus, HumanRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsRespiratory Syncytial Virus VaccinesVaccine EfficacyFemaleHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPregnancySystematic Reviews as TopicRespiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccineseffectivenessimmunogenicityliving systematic reviewpregnancyrespiratory syncytial virus vaccineRSV vaccine

Identifiers

PMID42893392
PMCPMC13676780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.