ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2026
Beyond Physical Recovery: Psychological Factors and Assessment Tools in Return to Sport Decision-making after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - A Scoping Review.
Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is among the most common surgical interventions following sport-related knee injury, yet fewer than two-thirds of athletes return to their pre-injury level of sport. Psychological factors are increasingly recognized as critical determinants of successful return to sport (RTS), yet psychological instruments remain inconsistently integrated into RTS decision-making and no consensus exists on which tools best capture the multidimensional nature of psychological readiness. The purpose of this review was to examine the psychological instruments used in RTS decision-making among athletes recovering from ACLR and identify gaps in current assessment practices. Study Design: Scoping Review. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across MEDLINE (via PubMed), SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL for peer-reviewed English-language studies published between 1999 and 2024 involving athletes who underwent ACLR and reported psychological factors or assessment tools relevant to RTS. Title, abstract, and full-text screening were independently conducted by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved through discussion and, when necessary, referral to a third reviewer. The review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. Forty-four studies met eligibility criteria and were included. Results: Twelve psychological assessment tools were identified across 44 studies. The Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale was the most frequently used instrument, appearing in 35 of 44 studies. The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) appeared in 11 studies and the Knee Self-Efficacy Scale (K-SES) in 8 studies. No single instrument captured the full psychological complexity of RTS readiness. Conclusion: Psychological readiness is a multidimensional construct requiring assessment beyond a single instrument. The ACL-RSI, TSK, and K-SES Level of Evidence: 2a.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.