ReviewCureus2026
Beyond the Mandibular Canal: A Narrative Review of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Variations and Their Clinical Significance.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is commonly presented as a relatively constant branch of the mandibular nerve that gives rise to the mylohyoid nerve (MHN), enters the mandibular foramen, follows a single mandibular canal, and terminates as mental and incisive branches. However, direct human anatomical evidence shows substantially greater complexity. This critical narrative review synthesizes cadaveric, microdissection, histological, imaging, and osteological evidence on proximal IAN roots, relationships with the maxillary artery, communications with neighboring mandibular nerve branches, MHN-derived accessory pathways, intramandibular fascicular organization, and neural structures associated with accessory canals or foramina. PubMed/MEDLINE was searched through August 20, 2026, with focused supplementary searches, Google Scholar citation searching, and reference-list screening; direct human neural evidence was prioritized over osseous inference. Histological studies show that a grossly single IAN can contain separately organized neural components, whereas proximal dissections demonstrate double roots, artery-through-nerve configurations, recurrent branches, and communications with the lingual and auriculotemporal nerves. The MHN may extend beyond its conventional motor territory, communicate with the lingual nerve, and use accessory mandibular pathways. Conversely, an accessory foramen or canal does not by itself establish the presence of an accessory IAN branch because some channels are predominantly vascular. The evidence is therefore best interpreted as a branching neuro-osseous continuum rather than a canal-only model. Clinically, these variants may help explain selected patterns of incomplete anesthesia or unexpected sensory and surgical anatomy, but bony imaging alone should not be used to infer causation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.