ArticleSpine surgery and related research2026
Relationship between Lumbar Spinal Movement and the Location of Type 1 Modic Changes in Elite Athletes.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Type 1 Modic change (MC1) is strongly associated with chronic low back pain, but it is unclear whether its anatomical distribution reflects sport-specific spinal loading in elite athletes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed elite athletes with chronic low back pain and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed MC1 who had a history of low back pain for >3 months and concordant pain relief after fluoroscopy-guided discography or selective disc block at the MC1 level. Athletes aged >60 years and those with a history of lumbar surgery, scoliosis >10°, or sagittal translation >4 mm were excluded. Three blinded reviewers classified the dominant spinal movement of each athlete during competition (flexion, extension, right/left lateral bending, or axial loading). The distribution pattern of MC1 (anterior, posterior, right, left, or entire) was determined on short-tau inversion recovery MRI scans. Correspondence was assessed only when all reviewers agreed on the dominant movement. Results: Eighteen athletes (19 levels) with a mean age of 34.5 years were included. MC1 (63%) was most frequently observed at L5-S1. MC1 was localized anteriorly in 42%, to the right in 26%, to the left in 16%, and involved the entire endplate in 16%. There were no posterior-only lesions. Rater consensus on the dominant movement was obtained for 10 athletes (involved in seven sports). Nine of these 10 athletes (90%) showed correspondence between the dominant movement and the distribution of MC1, including flexion with anterior MC1 and right lateral bending with right-sided MC1. Conclusions: Sports with a single dominant repetitive spinal movement often showed a match between that movement and the location of MC1. This finding supports a focal, load-related mechanism linking sport-specific spinal loading with MC1 in elite athletes with chronic low back pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.