ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2026
Automated Calculation of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) Intra-Abdominal Injury Rule from Unstructured Emergency Department Notes Using a Large Language Model.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) intra-abdominal injury clinical prediction rule identifies children at very low risk for clinically significant intra-abdominal injury after blunt abdominal trauma. However, retrospective evaluation of the rule's use in practice requires resource-intensive chart review. We investigated whether large language models (LLMs) can automatically calculate PECARN intra-abdominal injury risk scores from real-world unstructured emergency department (ED) notes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective secondary analysis of children after blunt abdominal trauma presenting to 2 urban pediatric EDs. The LLM, OpenAI o1, was compared with clinician-derived standards for PECARN risk scores and predictor variable extraction from unstructured physician ED notes. Performance was assessed using standard diagnostic test characteristics. Results: Among 196 children with complete ED notes, the LLM calculated binary PECARN risk scores with 95.4% accuracy (95% confidence interval [CI] 92.5 to 98.3), 94.4% sensitivity (95% CI 90.6 to 98.2), 98.2% specificity (95% CI 94.6 to 100), and an F1 score of 0.97 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.98). Agreement by weighted Cohen's kappa between multicategorical LLM-derived risk scores and clinician-derived risk scores was high, 0.96 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.00). Predictor variable extraction demonstrated strong performance across all PECARN variables, with accuracy greater than 94%. Conclusion: The LLM had comparable performance to clinicians in calculating binary and multicategorical PECARN intra-abdominal injury risk scores and extracting predictor variables from unstructured ED notes. LLMs may enable automated calculation of clinical prediction rules from clinical documentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.