ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026
In situ Simulation as a Training Tool in a Tertiary Pediatric Emergency Department in Italy: Enhancing Preparedness Where it Matters.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In situ simulation differs from in-centre simulation as it is conducted in the actual clinical environment rather than a simulation laboratory, thereby enhancing contextual realism and enabling identification of system-level vulnerabilities within clinical workflows. Objective: To evaluate the impact of in situ simulation on self-perceived competence, clinical performance, team dynamics, and system readiness in a tertiary pediatric emergency department in Italy. Methods: This prospective single-center observational study was conducted in a tertiary pediatric emergency department in Italy. A total of 55 healthcare professionals participated in 11 high-fidelity in situ simulation sessions. Participants completed pre- and post-intervention self-assessment questionnaires using a Likert-scale instrument developed for the study. Clinical performance was evaluated using a structured ABCDE-based checklist. No formal qualitative interviews were conducted. Statistical analysis was performed using paired Results: Significant improvements were observed across all assessed domains, particularly in ABCDE assessment, ventilation, and defibrillator use (p<0.001). Junior residents and participants without recent EPALS certification demonstrated the greatest improvement. In situ simulation also identified latent safety threats related to equipment availability and clinical workflow. Conclusion: In situ simulation improves perceived clinical competence and team performance while providing actionable insights into system-level safety vulnerabilities. Future research should incorporate objective performance metrics and validated assessment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.