ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026
Clodronate and trehalose exhibit a paradoxical antagonistic interaction that suppresses proliferation of canine mammary tumour cells.
Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clodronate and trehalose are known to modulate metabolic and autophagy-related pathways, respectively, yet their combined effects on tumour cell proliferation remain poorly understood. This study investigated the individual and combined effects of these compounds on the canine mammary tumour cell line CMT-U27 and explored underlying mechanisms using network pharmacology. Cell proliferation was assessed following treatment with clodronate, trehalose, and their combination across a range of concentrations. Growth rate analysis and Bliss independence modelling were used to evaluate drug interactions. Target prediction was performed using SwissTargetPrediction, followed by homology mapping to canine proteins and protein-protein interaction and enrichment analysis in STRING. Hybrid compounds (CT compounds) predicted to be derived from clodronate and trehalose were also analysed. Target expression relevance was validated using gene expression data, and molecular docking was conducted using AutoDock Vina. Clodronate and trehalose individually promoted proliferation in CMT-U27 cells, whereas their combination produced a dose-dependent suppression of proliferation. Network analysis revealed that clodronate targets were enriched in IGFR and Ras signalling pathways, while Trehalose targets were associated with proteostasis and metabolic regulation pathways. These findings supported their individual proliferative effects but did not explain the suppressive combination effect. CT compounds demonstrated distinct target profiles enriched in extracellular matrix remodelling and lipid metabolism pathways, consistent with anti-proliferative activity. Integration with gene expression data identified key targets associated with proliferation (clodronate and trehalose) and inhibition (CT compounds). Molecular docking suggested favourable binding interactions with these targets. The paradoxical suppression of tumour cell proliferation by the combined use of clodronate and trehalose, may be due to metabolic-autophagic incompatibility and the potential formation of novel bioactive compounds. These findings highlight the importance of pathway integration and suggest exploring therapeutic strategy based on simultaneous targeting of metabolic and proteostatic mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.