Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42893173›Full record

ArticleMental health practice2025

Dialectical behaviour therapy in the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a commentary.

K Gomez Ujhelyi, E Rushton, J Harrison, J E Edward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mental health practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K Gomez UjhelyiUniversity of Liverpool.
E RushtonLancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust.
J HarrisonUniversity of Lancashire.
J E EdwardUniversity of Lancashire.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) was designed specifically to treat deliberate self-harm (with or without suicide intent) in women with borderline personality disorder (BPD). It has received the most research attention compared to other psychological approaches in this area. The aim of this commentary is to critically appraise the evidence provided by a systematic review on the effects of DBT on self-harm, suicidal ideation, anger, and depression in individuals with BPD. The methods used was Rapid Conversion of Evidence Summaries, a collaborative and educational approach between academics and health and care professionals to understand and summarise research evidence and its implications to practice and policy. As such, the work involved the critical appraisal of a systematic review relevant for the mental health nurse's work involved in the project, using the AMSTAR2 Critical Appraisal tool for systematic reviews. Based on the findings, there is preliminary evidence for the potential of DBT to reduce self-harm behaviours and depression, although the evidence is low quality. Further research is necessary to increase our confidence in the effectiveness of DBT in the treatment of BPD.

Identifiers

PMID42893173
PMCPMC7619585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.