ArticleCureus2026
A Low-Cost Device for Teaching Surgical Techniques and Evaluating Technology in Minimally Invasive Surgery.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) spans multiple surgical disciplines and offers multiple benefits. Widespread adoption of MIS techniques has been hindered in part by technical challenges from steep learning curves and limited options for low-cost training for surgeons. This technical report describes the design and utility of a 3-D printed MIS simulator as a platform for acquiring skills in MIS techniques, as illustrated by the demonstration and comparison of multiple endoscopic dural repair techniques. The MIS simulator was constructed from 3-D printed and commercially available components, which provided the following attributes: (1) video perspective of the surgical target equivalent to endoscopic visualization; (2) variable access parameters, including portal size and angle of approach; and (3) adaptable surgical target to simulate the anatomy and physical characteristics of a particular surgical scenario. The estimated cost for the simulator was in the range of $200 to $300. The simulator was used to acquire technical skills and compare alternative techniques for MIS endoscopic durotomy repair. It allowed a comparison of different MIS techniques and demonstrated operator competency. The MIS simulator provides a portable, low-cost model for teaching MIS techniques by emulating the technical, anatomical, and physical characteristics of a common MIS encounter. The simulator can be readily modified to include multiple MIS settings and can be used for both training and technical development of instrumentation or novel surgical approaches. Due to its low cost and portability, the simulator is well-suited for care environments where limited tools and materials are available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.