ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Best Evidence Summary for Integrated Care Management of Dysphagia in Hospitalized Older Adults.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate and summarize the best available evidence on integrated care management of dysphagia in hospitalized older adults, providing an evidence-based reference for clinical practice. Methods: Evidence was systematically retrieved from Chinese and international databases, clinical practice guideline repositories, and professional association websites. Eligible publications included best practice recommendations, evidence summaries, clinical practice guidelines, expert consensus statements, and systematic reviews published between January 1, 2015, and January 31, 2026. Two trained researchers independently appraised the methodological quality of included literature using standardized quality assessment tools, graded the evidence using the JBI evidence pre-grading system, and synthesized the extracted findings. Results: A total of 28 documents were included, comprising 3 best practice recommendations, 9 evidence summaries, 3 clinical guidelines, 10 expert consensus statements, and 3 systematic reviews. From this synthesis, 43 recommendations were derived across seven key domains: (I) establishment of multidisciplinary teams, (II) dysphagia screening, (III) comprehensive assessment, (IV) integrated care management, (V) rehabilitation interventions, (VI) prevention and management of complications, and (VII) discharge planning and follow-up. Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive summary of best evidence for integrated care management of dysphagia in hospitalized older adults, offering a robust evidence base to inform standardized clinical pathways and practice guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.