ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2026
The Reliability and Validity of a Novel Isometric Trunk Rotation Strength Test.
Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Trunk rotation (TR) strength and power play an important role in overhead sports for both sport-specific performance and injury risk-reduction. However, clinically applicable, reliable and valid methods to measure isometric TR strength have not been previously described. Purpose: To assess a) the test-retest reliability of a novel isometric TR strength test, performed in a half-kneeling position, and b) the convergent validity of the isometric TR strength test by assessing its correlation with a seated dynamic TR power test. Study Design: Cross-sectional cohort study. Methods: Eighteen participants, recruited from the general public, took part in this study. Isometric TR strength was measured over two consecutive days in a half-kneeling position using a digital dynamometer. Dynamic TR power was measured once in a seated position, using a pulley system and inertial sensors. The test-retest reliability of the isometric TR strength test was assessed with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) 3.3, and standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC90) were calculated. The convergent validity was interpreted based on the correlation between peak values of the isometric TR strength test and the dynamic TR power test. Results: The results showed excellent test-retest reliability for the isometric TR strength test (ICC 3.3 = 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.98), with a SEM of 6.7 N, and a MDC90 value of 15.6 N. A strong correlation was found between the peak values for the isometric TR strength test and the dynamic TR power test (rs = 0.73, p < 0.001, 95% bootstrap confidence interval 0.40- 0.89). Conclusions: This study addresses a gap in the literature regarding reliable and valid methods to measure isometric TR strength, thus contributing to our understanding of injuries and performance in overhead sports. The results provide professionals working with overhead athletes with a convenient and practical test to measure isometric TR strength. Level of Evidence: 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.