ArticleNeurology. Education2026
Education Research: Career, Research, and Mentorship Outcomes of an International Neuroimmunology Education Exchange Program.
Article in Neurology. Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Subspecialty exchange programs in neuroimmunology are scarce and have not been formally evaluated. We assessed participant-reported outcomes of the Neuroimmunology Exchange Scholarship Program (PROBEN), a 1-month immersive placement sponsored by the Brazilian Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, covering career trajectory, research engagement, and mentorship. Methods: Cross-sectional online survey of all 39 Brazilian neurology residents, fellows, and early-career neurologists who completed a PROBEN placement during the 3 most recent cycles (2023-2025) at 13 host centers (9 in Brazil, 4 abroad); 30 responded (77%). Outcomes were compared by career stage at placement (early career, residents or general neurologists, vs later stage, neuroimmunology fellows or neuroimmunologists) and by location (national vs international), using the Kruskal-Wallis, chi-square (Yates correction), and Fisher exact tests. Analyses were exploratory and unadjusted for multiple comparisons. Results: The mean age was 30 years (range 26-38); 18 respondents (60%) were early career and 18 (60%) trained at national centers. Satisfaction was high (17 of 30 [57%] excellent), all 30 would recommend the program, and 18 of 29 (62%, 95% CI 44-77) reported that it influenced their decision to continue in neuroimmunology, with no difference by location ( Discussion: Participants in this 1-month neuroimmunology exchange reported sustained subspecialty interest, ongoing mentorship, and academic engagement. Later career stage and international placement were associated with greater academic engagement in this cohort. Because participants were competitively selected and largely self-selected into placement location, these associations should not be read as causal effects of the program.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.