Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42893110›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Intraoperative Breakage and Endoscopic Retrieval of a Dismantled Triprong Forceps During Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy: A Rare Complication and Review of the Literature.

Deep Jumrani, Ankur Mittal, Vikas K Panwar, Aayush Lakkanna, Shivam Upadhayaya

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deep JumraniUrology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Ankur MittalUrology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Vikas K PanwarUrology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Aayush LakkannaUrology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Shivam UpadhayayaUrology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy (URSL) has become the gold-standard procedure for management of ureteric calculi. Ancillary stone-retrieval instruments such as triprong and biprong forceps facilitate fragment extraction; however, mechanical failure of these devices during active use is a recognized, albeit rarely documented, intraoperative hazard. We describe a 68-year-old woman who underwent left-sided URSL for a 1 cm upper ureteric calculus at the L4 vertebral level. During stone-fragment retrieval, the distal prongs of a triprong forceps sheared off within the ureter. The retained fragment was successfully retrieved endoscopically under direct vision using a biprong forceps introduced through a larger-calibre ureteroscope, obviating the need for open or laparoscopic exploration. Instrument fracture during URSL can occur due to metal fatigue from repeated sterilisation cycles, manufacturing defects, or excessive force applied to impacted calculi. Pre-procedural inspection of instruments, avoidance of instrument reuse beyond recommended cycles, complete laser fragmentation of stones before grasping, and availability of rescue instruments (biprong forceps, stone baskets, holmium laser) are paramount preventive and remedial strategies. This case adds to the sparse literature on triprong forceps failure during ureteroscopy and provides a stepwise endoscopic management algorithm for the practising urologist.

Indexed as

biprong forcepsinstrument fractureintraoperative complicationstone retrievaltriprong forcepsureteric calculusureteroscopyursl

Identifiers

PMID42893110
PMCPMC13675864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.