ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2026
Electric field spread contributes to stimulation intensity-dependent expansion of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation motor map.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is used for preoperative motor mapping, yet mechanisms of stimulation-intensity (SI)-dependent map expansion remain unclear. We investigated whether the extent of the induced electric field (EF) contributes to map expansion, using anatomical cavities adjacent to motor cortex as a model. Methods: Two patients with postoperative and developmental cavities underwent nTMS mapping at 105% and 120% of resting motor threshold (rMT). Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded within cavities and intact cortex. Associations among distance from the cortical margin, rMT, and MEP amplitude were assessed. Map extension from reference points (RPs) was quantified toward cavities and intact tissue. In the postoperative case, finite-element modelling compared EF distributions in native and reconstructed anatomy. Results: MEPs were elicited within cortex-free cavities despite absent cortical tissue beneath stimulation sites. Increasing distance from the cortical margin was associated with higher rMT and lower MEP amplitude. Higher SI expanded motor maps toward cavities and intact tissue. At 120% rMT, map extent from RPs was greater toward intact tissue, although directional distances are not physiologically equivalent because the functional motor-map boundary over intact cortex is unknown. Finite-element modelling showed high concordance between native and reconstructed anatomies, with a mean absolute EF difference of 1.34 V/m across stimulation sites. Conclusions: Positive nTMS sites within cortex-free cavities demonstrate spatial dissociation between nominal stimulation sites and the neural elements generating MEPs. Findings support a contribution of EF spatial extent to SI-dependent map expansion. Significance: Increasing SI improves response detection but may reduce spatial specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.