Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42893092›Full record

ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2026

Electric field spread contributes to stimulation intensity-dependent expansion of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation motor map.

Evangelia Chatzikyriakou, Konstantinos Pastiadis, Theodoros Samaras, Nikolaos Foroglou, Marietta Tzirini, Symeon Damianidis, Konstantinos Kouskouras, Vasilios Papaliagkas, Evripidis Pityrigkas, Vasiliki Poulidou and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Evangelia Chatzikyriakou1st Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54636, Greece.
Konstantinos PastiadisSchool of Music Studies, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 57001, Greece.
Theodoros SamarasSchool of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece.
Nikolaos ForoglouDepartment of Neurosurgery, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54636, Greece.
Marietta TziriniSchool of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece.
Symeon DamianidisSchool of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece.
Konstantinos KouskourasDepartment of Radiology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54636, Greece.
Vasilios PapaliagkasDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, International Hellenic University, Thessaloniki 57001, Greece.
Evripidis Pityrigkas1st Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54636, Greece.
Vasiliki Poulidou1st Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54636, Greece.
Ioannis Vlachos1st Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54636, Greece.
Dimitris KugiumtzisDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece.
Vasilios K Kimiskidis1st Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54636, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is used for preoperative motor mapping, yet mechanisms of stimulation-intensity (SI)-dependent map expansion remain unclear. We investigated whether the extent of the induced electric field (EF) contributes to map expansion, using anatomical cavities adjacent to motor cortex as a model. Methods: Two patients with postoperative and developmental cavities underwent nTMS mapping at 105% and 120% of resting motor threshold (rMT). Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded within cavities and intact cortex. Associations among distance from the cortical margin, rMT, and MEP amplitude were assessed. Map extension from reference points (RPs) was quantified toward cavities and intact tissue. In the postoperative case, finite-element modelling compared EF distributions in native and reconstructed anatomy. Results: MEPs were elicited within cortex-free cavities despite absent cortical tissue beneath stimulation sites. Increasing distance from the cortical margin was associated with higher rMT and lower MEP amplitude. Higher SI expanded motor maps toward cavities and intact tissue. At 120% rMT, map extent from RPs was greater toward intact tissue, although directional distances are not physiologically equivalent because the functional motor-map boundary over intact cortex is unknown. Finite-element modelling showed high concordance between native and reconstructed anatomies, with a mean absolute EF difference of 1.34 V/m across stimulation sites. Conclusions: Positive nTMS sites within cortex-free cavities demonstrate spatial dissociation between nominal stimulation sites and the neural elements generating MEPs. Findings support a contribution of EF spatial extent to SI-dependent map expansion. Significance: Increasing SI improves response detection but may reduce spatial specificity.

Indexed as

Anatomical cavityElectric field modellingFinite-element modellingMotor evoked potentialsMotor mappingNavigated transcranial magnetic stimulationPreoperative functional mapping

Identifiers

PMID42893092
PMCPMC13675860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.