ArticleBrain & spine2026
Extracranial-intracranial bypass as hemodynamic rescue for inflammatory intracranial stenosis: A case series and literature review.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Inflammatory intracranial stenosis is an uncommon cause of cerebral ischemia. Although medical therapy remains the first-line treatment, some patients continue to experience recurrent symptoms driven by hemodynamic failure. In this setting, the role of extracranial-intracranial bypass remains poorly defined. Research question: Can extracranial-intracranial bypass serve as an adjunctive hemodynamic rescue strategy in selected patients with refractory inflammatory intracranial stenosis? Material and methods: We retrospectively reviewed three patients who underwent surgical revascularization for inflammatory intracranial stenosis and performed a focused literature review of reported bypass cases for vasculitis-related intracranial steno-occlusive disease. Clinical presentation, imaging findings, perfusion assessment, operative strategy, graft patency, and outcomes were analyzed descriptively. Results: All patients had recurrent ischemic symptoms with progressive intracranial steno-occlusive disease and/or impaired cerebrovascular reserve. No bypass required direct anastomosis to a donor or recipient vessel known to show evidence of active inflammation. No intraoperative complications, early postoperative ischemic events, wound complications, or early graft failures occurred. During follow-up, subsequent ischemic events, when present, involved territories remote from the bypass-dependent cortex. Discussion and conclusion: Extracranial-intracranial bypass does not treat the inflammatory disease itself but may provide targeted hemodynamic support in highly selected patients with refractory ischemic symptoms and impaired cerebrovascular reserve. The present experience is exploratory, and further collaborative reporting is needed to clarify indications, timing, and durability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.