ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2026
Corollary discharge dysfunction in auditory verbal hallucinations: N100 suppression measured with semi-dry electrodes.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Corollary discharge dysfunction in patients with auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) is reflected in failure to attenuate the N100 event-related potential. Previous research has shown mixed findings regarding N100 suppression and hallucination severity, generally using broad symptom scales rather than AVH-specific measures. This study investigated corollary discharge and its relationship with comprehensively characterized auditory hallucinations. Methods: Corollary discharge was investigated in 14 patients with persistent auditory hallucinations and 15 healthy controls using an EEG paradigm using semi-dry electrodes where participants self-generated sounds in a "talk" condition and listened to playback in a "listen" condition. N100 suppression was calculated as the peak-amplitude difference (μV) between talk and listen in the 60-150 ms window. Auditory hallucinations were assessed with the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales Auditory Hallucination Subscale (PSYRATS-AHS). Results: Between-group analysis of the fronto-central ROI (Fz-Cz) showed a statistically non-significant trend toward greater N100 suppression in healthy controls compared to AVH patients ( Conclusions: Hallucination severity is related to impaired corollary discharge mechanisms, supporting its role as a mechanistic basis for auditory hallucinations. Significance: The preliminary correlation with PSYRATS-AHS suggests potential value in using symptom-specific assessment tools in research on auditory hallucinations, warranting replication in larger samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.