ReviewIJID regions2026
Azithromycin in crisis: antimicrobial resistance, diagnostics gaps, and vaccine-linked stewardship for enteric infections in low- and middle-income countries.
Review in IJID regions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Azithromycin remains an important oral treatment option for enteric infections in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where rising fluoroquinolone resistance, limited diagnostic capacity, and restricted access to parenteral therapy have encouraged widespread empirical use. Increasing azithromycin resistance among Objectives: This Perspective examines azithromycin resistance as a health-system challenge rather than solely a microbiological phenomenon. Diagnostic gaps, prolonged empirical prescribing, over-the-counter availability, and inadequate antimicrobial stewardship contribute to sustained selective pressure. The drug's prolonged half-life, extensive tissue and intracellular penetration, and sustained intestinal exposure may further facilitate resistance selection. Importantly, resistance mechanisms, susceptibility patterns, and clinical-microbiological relationships differ substantially among enteric pathogens, limiting the value of uniform treatment strategies. The Perspective highlights diagnostic stewardship, pathogen-specific surveillance, locally relevant susceptibility interpretation, and vaccination as complementary approaches to reducing unnecessary azithromycin exposure. Conclusion: Preserving azithromycin requires coordinated health-system interventions that integrate accessible diagnostics, pathogen-directed antimicrobial stewardship, resistance surveillance, regulation of antibiotic access, and vaccination. Such an approach is particularly important in LMICs, where azithromycin remains one of the few accessible oral options for severe enteric infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.