Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42892995›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research

Gypsum-calcium carbonate-gelatine composite graft for bone repair: Biocompatibility and histological assessment in a rat model.

Anne Handrini Dewi, Andi Triawan, Mas Sahidayana Mohktar, Muhammad Akhsan Pridatama, Hersandy Dayu Kusuma, Fitri Nur Kayati, Aryan Morita, Retno Ardhani, Ananto Ali Alhasyimi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne Handrini DewiDepartment of Dental Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sleman, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Andi TriawanDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sleman, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Mas Sahidayana MohktarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Muhammad Akhsan PridatamaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sleman, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Hersandy Dayu KusumaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia.
Fitri Nur KayatiResearch Center for Food Technology and Processing, National Research and Innovation Agency, Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Aryan MoritaDepartment of Dental Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sleman, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Retno ArdhaniDepartment of Dental Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sleman, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Ananto Ali AlhasyimiDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sleman, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gypsum (calcium sulphate dihydrate; POP) is a resorbable synthetic bone substitute with favourable biocompatibility; however, its rapid degradation limits clinical effectiveness. A modified composite incorporating calcium carbonate and gelatine hydrogel (POPHD) was developed to improve degradation control and osteogenic performance. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the biocompatibility and histological response of POP and POPHD in vitro and in vivo, with emphasis on cytotoxicity, soft-tissue response, and bone regeneration capacity. Methods: Cytotoxicity was assessed using the MTT assay on NIH3T3 fibroblast cells after 24 h of exposure. Twenty male Wistar rats were used for in vivo evaluation, comprising primary dermal irritation testing, subcutaneous implantation (14 days), and femoral condyle implantation (3 and 30 days). Histological sections were stained with haematoxylin-eosin and Mallory's trichrome and evaluated using validated grading scales. Results: Both materials demonstrated no cytotoxicity (cell viability >80%) and caused no skin irritation (PDII score 0). Subcutaneous implantation revealed comparable soft-tissue responses, though POPHD showed significantly greater angiogenesis (p = 0.003) and foreign body giant cell formation (p = 0.035), consistent with slower degradation. At 3 days post-femoral implantation, both groups showed similar early inflammatory responses. At 30 days, POPHD demonstrated superior bone formation quality and quantity (Score 3 vs Score 2) and enhanced angiogenic activity (p = 0.008) compared to POP. Conclusions: Modification of gypsum with calcium carbonate-gelatine hydrogel preserved biocompatibility while reducing degradation rate and promoting more advanced bone regeneration, suggesting POPHD as a promising synthetic bone graft substitute warranting further long-term investigation.

Indexed as

Biocompatible implantHistological assessmentRegenerative bone therapy

Identifiers

PMID42892995
PMCPMC13676106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.