ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026
New reconstruction algorithm for stack artifact reduction in breathing-adaptive four-dimensional computed tomography.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeEven with new adaptive four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) techniques, artifacts can still occur with strong irregular breathing amplitudes. A new image reconstruction algorithm, currently available for cardiac CT, was tested on 4DCT data for its performance to reduce stack artifacts and thus improve anatomical correctness. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe 'ZeeFree' algorithm employs a deformable image registration during reconstruction to reduce remaining stack artifacts. Its performance was evaluated using data of 20 irregular breathing ('challenging group') and 10 randomly selected ('verification group') patients with tumors in the thorax. Using a 5-score-scale, image quality in terms of stack artifacts was rated by three physicians and three physicists. Statistical significance was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the mean ratings and the Chi-square test for anatomical correctness.
resultsExpert scoring revealed that 88.3% of the amplitude-based ZeeFree reconstructions showed (almost) no artifacts (rated with ≥ 4) compared to 66.8% of the standard reconstruction. With phase-based binning, 70.0% of the ZeeFree and 23.3% of standard were rated with a score ≥ 4. Mean scores were 4.1 and 4.0 for amplitude- and phase-based binning with ZeeFree and 3.4 and 2.5 for standard reconstruction, respectively. Differences were significant (
conclusionsThis study demonstrated a statistically significant reduction of stack artifacts, resulting in improved anatomical correctness when ZeeFree was applied to 4DCTs. The algorithm was not observed to introduce new artifacts on already artifact-free images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.