ReviewBlood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis2026
Beyond thrombosis: a scoping review of patient-reported outcomes in antiphospholipid syndrome.
Review in Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity, with heterogeneous nonthrombotic manifestations that may substantially affect daily functioning and well-being. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) offer a direct assessment of symptom burden and quality of life but remain underutilized in APS. We performed a scoping review of PubMed from inception through July 2025 using terms related to APS and PROs (quality of life, fatigue, pain, depression, psychological well-being, and health surveys). We included eligible English-language studies that reported PROs in APS. Both qualitative and quantitative studies were included. Twelve cohort studies evaluated PROs in APS. Most studies used legacy instruments such as the 36-item short form health survey. A few recent studies have used patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) tools. Across studies, patients with APS reported impairments in multiple domains of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as well as overall HRQOL compared with population norms, which are associated with comorbid systemic lupus erythematosus (secondary APS), a history of thrombosis, and greater end-organ damage. Anticoagulation monitoring and international normalized ratio lability contributed to treatment dissatisfaction and reduced HRQOL. Major gaps include the longitudinal assessment of PROs and their temporal relation to clinical events and the evaluation of PROs in obstetric APS and children and older adults with APS. No APS-specific PRO instruments have been developed. There is a need to either develop APS-specific instruments or validate generic instruments such as PROMIS measures in large representative APS cohorts. Incorporating PROs into clinical practice and research can enhance clinical care and facilitate patient-centered, personalized management of APS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.