ReviewJHLT open2026
Indications and outcomes of ventricular assist devices in children and young adults with neuromuscular diseases: A systematic review.
Review in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) are frequently complicated by progressive cardiomyopathy leading to advanced heart failure. Ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation has emerged as a potential option in selected pediatric and young adult patients, but evidence on indications and outcomes is limited. We aimed to systematically review evidence on VAD implantation in children and young adults with NMDs, focusing on device strategies and clinical outcomes. Methods: Systematic review following Cochrane methodology and reported per the PRISMA guidelines. Six major biomedical databases were searched from inception to October 1, 2025. Studies including patients aged ≤25 years with NMDs undergoing VAD implantation were eligible. The primary outcome was clinical status at last reported follow-up, classified as alive on device support, alive after heart transplantation (HT), or deceased. Results: Six retrospective studies comprising 37 patients were included. Duchenne muscular dystrophy was the most common diagnosis (48.6%). Destination therapy was the most frequently reported strategy (45.9%), followed by bridge-to-transplant (37.8%) and bridge-to-decision (16.2%). At last follow-up, 75.7% were alive: 43.2% on device support and 32.4% after undergoing HT; 24.3% had died. Complications were common, most frequently bleeding and infection, whereas neurologic events were the leading cause of death. Reporting of functional outcomes and quality of life was sparse and heterogeneous. Conclusions: Evidence on VAD use in this population is limited to small retrospective cohorts. Although most patients were alive at last reported follow-up, morbidity remains substantial and patient-centered outcomes are poorly characterized. Prospective multicenter studies with standardized outcome definitions are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.