ArticleDiabetes, obesity, and cardiometabolic CARE
Electronic Health Record-Based Algorithms May Improve Identification of Cases of Atypical Diabetes, Including in Groups Underrepresented in Biomedical Research.
Article in Diabetes, obesity, and cardiometabolic CARE. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether electronic health record (EHR)-based algorithms can identify individuals with atypical diabetes (AD) eligible for the Rare and Atypical Diabetes Network (RADIANT) study and whether these algorithms improve identification and enrollment of individuals from populations underrepresented in biomedical research (UBR). RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsTwo RADIANT clinical sites independently developed EHR-based algorithms to identify AD phenotypes, including a lean type 2 diabetes-like physiology without features of metabolic syndrome (site 1) and concurrent diagnoses of type 1 and type 2 diabetes (site 2). Demographic characteristics were compared using χ
resultsDeployment of EHR-based algorithms identified 550 individuals in site 1 and 620 individuals in site 2, with 108 and 147 deemed eligible for RADIANT recruitment, respectively. Compared with prior RADIANT participants at these sites, EHR-identified, RADIANT-eligible individuals were more likely to self-identify as a race or ethnicity besides non-Hispanic White and prefer a language other than English. Of the 53 and 57 individuals who were successfully contacted at sites 1 and 2, respectively, 8 and 14 enrolled in RADIANT, representing meaningful contributions to total enrollment (21% and 22% at sites 1 and 2, respectively) compared with pre-EHR-based recruitment. However, demographics of newly enrolled individuals did not differ from traditionally recruited participants.
conclusionsEHR-based algorithms successfully identified rare diabetes phenotypes and yielded greater representation of study-eligible individuals from UBR populations than traditional participant identification methods. However, additional strategies are needed to address persistent barriers to participation of UBR populations in AD research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.