Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42892693›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

Moral distress and moral injury among nurses in German acute inpatient care - a cross-sectional study.

Tobias Mai, Anna-Henrikje Seidlein, Michael Schilder, Iulia Dahmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tobias MaiNursing Research, Nursing Department, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Anna-Henrikje SeidleinInstitute of Health Sciences, Chair for Nursing Science, University Medicine Rostock, Schillingallee 70, 18057, Rostock, Germany. Anna-henrikje.seidlein@med.uni-rostock.de.
Michael SchilderEvangelische Hochschule Hessen, Protestant University of Applied Sciences, Darmstadt, Germany.
Iulia DahmerInstitute of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modelling, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMoral suffering in health care is increasingly a focus of research. The extent of and relationship between two distinct forms of moral suffering, namely, moral injury (MI) and moral distress (MD), has not yet been studied in nurses in acute inpatient care in Germany.

objectivesThis study aims to examine the severity of MI and MD in the context of organizational support, the correlation between the two constructs, and the variables associated with the extent of MD and MI.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study including 1323 nurses employed in German hospitals. The data were collected in March and April 2023 in an online survey using the German version of the Moral Distress Scale (MDS), the German Moral Injury Symptom Scale for Health Professionals (G-MISS-HP), the Perceived Organizational Support Scale (POS-s) and an additional questionnaire on the individual perception of ethical and structural conditions in the institution. The data were analyzed descriptively. Partial credit Rasch models were fitted to the item-level responses of the G-MISS-HP and the MDS to obtain interval-level measures of moral injury and moral distress for subsequent analyses. Median regressions with backward variable selection were performed for MD- and MI-Rasch scores to identify variables associated with the level of moral distress/injury. The associations between the MD and MI-Rasch scores were tested using Spearman's correlation test.

resultsA total of 68.6% (n = 907; 95% CI: 66.1%-71.1%) of the respondents scored above the validated G-MISS-HP screening threshold (≥ 29), which has previously been associated with impairment in family, social, and occupational functioning. Spearman's correlation analysis revealed statistically significant positive associations between the MD-Rasch score and the MI-Rasch subscores (guilt/shame subscore: r = 0.57, 95% CI [0.53; 0.61]; spiritual troubles subscore: r = 0.22, 95% CI [0.16; 0.27]; condemnation subscore: r = 0.39, 95% CI [0.34; 0.43], all p < 0.001). Median regression analyses revealed significant associations of both MD and MI with perceived organizational support (POS-s), satisfaction with the treatment team's consideration of own perspective, responsibility for staff, and participation in interprofessional case discussions.

conclusionsManifestations of moral suffering are common. Our findings highlight the importance of measures to promote an ethical climate and to address the negative consequences of moral suffering, particularly at the management level. REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register ( https://www.drks.de/ ): DRKS00030785 (date: 06 February 2023).

Indexed as

Moral distressMoral injuryMoral integrityMoral sufferingNursingOrganizational cultureOrganizational support

Identifiers

PMID42892693
PMCPMC13676794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.