Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42892692›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2026

Effect of local melatonin application on immediately placed implants in maxillary premolars (a biochemical and radiographic randomized controlled clinical trial).

Toka Moustafa Helal, Magda Mohamed Saleh, Dina M N Metawie

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07103564 (The Evaluation of the Effect of Local Melatonin Application Around Immediately Placed Implants in the Maxillary Premolars), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07103564 nacompletednot on this map

The Evaluation of the Effect of Local Melatonin Application Around Immediately Placed Implants in the Maxillary Premolars (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHams Hamed AbdelrahmanRan2024 to 2025Enrolled24ConditionsDental Implants, Osteoprotegerin, MelatoninArmsImmediately placed implant in maxillary premolars with local melatonin application, Immediately placed implant in maxillary premolars without local melatonin application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Toka Moustafa HelalDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Magda Mohamed SalehDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Dina M N MetawieDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. dina.nader@alexu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7789-9822

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMelatonin, a potent antioxidant and bone-regulating hormone, promotes osteoblastic activity and inhibits osteoclastic differentiation primarily through upregulation of osteoprotegerin (OPG) and suppression of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) pathway. Given its dual osteogenic and antiresorptive effects, melatonin may enhance bone remodelling around immediately placed implants. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of locally applied melatonin on peri-implant bone remodelling by assessing changes in OPG levels and radiographic bone parameters over time. PATIENTS AND

methodsTwenty-four patients with non-restorable maxillary premolars were divided into two groups. The melatonin group received immediately placed implants with local melatonin application, and the control group received immediately placed implants without melatonin application. Serum OPG levels were measured one and three months postoperatively, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed immediately after implant placement and at six months postoperatively to assess relative bone density, bone volume, and marginal bone loss.

resultsBiochemical findings: At one month, OPG levels were significantly higher in the melatonin group compared to the control group (p = 0.012). By 3 months, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.707). Radiographic findings: After six months, relative bone density was numerically higher in the melatonin group than in the control group, although the between-group difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.372). However, the percentage increase from baseline was significantly greater in the melatonin group (p = 0.002). Bone volume decreased in both groups, with a percent reduction in bone volume that was significantly smaller in the melatonin group compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Marginal bone loss was significantly lower in the melatonin group compared to the control group (p < 0.001).

conclusionLocally applied melatonin was associated with favourable early biochemical and radiographic outcomes, including a greater percentage increase in relative bone density from baseline, preservation of peri-implant bone volume, and reduced marginal bone loss.

trial registrationThe trial was retrospectively registered at the Clinicaltrials.gov registry (Registration ID #NCT07103564), first submitted on July 29, 2025 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07103564 .

Indexed as

BicuspidBone RemodelingImmediate Dental Implant LoadingMelatoninAdultAlveolar Bone LossBone DensityCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansMaleMaxillaMiddle AgedOsteoprotegerinMelatoninOsteoprotegerinBone volumeCBCTImmediately placed implantsMarginal bone lossMelatoninOsteoprotegerinRelative bone density

Identifiers

PMID42892692
PMCPMC13676005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.