In one paragraphArticle in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
9 authors.
Sara SepicDepartment of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Karthik V GottemukkalaDepartment of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Jiale DuDepartment of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Samuel A MaiwaldDepartment of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7235-2748 Jakub ChrustowiczDepartment of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3059-1863 Eleftheria C PapadopoulouDepartment of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7303-694X Luca J StierDepartment of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Susanne von GronauDepartment of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Brenda A SchulmanDepartment of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany. schulman@biochem.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3083-1126 Funding
Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds (Stiftung für medizinische Grundlagenforschung) PhD fellowshipBoehringer Ingelheim Fonds (Stiftung für medizinische Grundlagenforschung) PhD FellowshipEC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) UPSmeetMet, 101098161Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (Max Planck Society) Brenda Schulman Department
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
The GID/CTLH family of E3 ubiquitin ligases employs several substrate receptor subunits that recruit distinct degrons, but the substrate recognition mechanisms of the CTLH
Indexed as
Ubiquitin-Protein LigasesAcetylationCryoelectron MicroscopyDegronsHEK293 CellsHumansProtein BindingSubstrate SpecificityUbiquitinationUbiquitin-Protein Ligases
Identifiers
PMID42892655
PMCPMC13676621
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390