ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2026
Machine learning-based detection and area quantification of mechanical and corrosion damage in femoral stem tapers.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Corrosion and mechanical damage at modular femoral taper junctions remain important degradation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty. Yet, their assessment commonly relies on ordinal visual scoring methods that reduce spatially heterogeneous damage to a single severity grade. Here, we present a SegFormer-based semantic segmentation framework for pixel-level identification and quantitative assessment of tribocorrosion damage on Ti6Al4V tapered shafts following controlled hip simulator testing. We manually annotated a dataset of 576 high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images into background, corrosion, and mechanical damage classes, using representative SEM and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analyses and literature for damage feature identification. The model was trained using a hybrid weighted cross-entropy and Dice loss, and a structured three-stage hyperparameter optimization strategy. Five independently seeded models were subsequently combined for ensemble inference to improve full-field damage quantification and assess seed-dependent prediction variability. On the independent test set, the final model achieved IoU values of 0.678 for corrosion and 0.496 for mechanical damage, with an overall pixel accuracy of 0.947. As a proof-of-concept application, the developed framework was applied to two representative taper cases, consisting of Ti6Al4V shafts coupled with either Ti6Al4V or CoCrMo femoral heads, to demonstrate full-field damage quantification. Ensemble analysis showed that the representative Ti6Al4V/CoCrMo case exhibited a greater corrosion area and more spatially concentrated corrosion than the Ti6Al4V/Ti6Al4V case. Region-size analysis further revealed that larger localized regions contributed substantially to the total corrosion area, including a single 0.50 to 1.00 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.