ArticleInternational ophthalmology2026
A retrospective analysis of treatment switch from faricimab to aflibercept 8 mg in nAMD.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMacular neovascularization is one of the most common causes of irreversible vision loss. Intravitreal injections with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor are the treatment of choice. In recent years, new drugs such as faricimab and aflibercept 8 mg have paved the way for longer intervals between intravitreal injections. However, there are currently very few comparative studies on these longer-acting drugs.
methodsThis retrospective analysis included patients with at least three consecutive intravitreal injections of faricimab due to neovascular age-related macular degeneration who were subsequently switched from faricimab to aflibercept 8 mg in 2024. The primary outcome was the change in central retinal thickness as measured by optical coherence tomography. The secondary outcome was best-corrected visual acuity.
results41 eyes of 38 patients were included. There were no statistically significant changes in retinal thickness. Best-corrected visual acuity showed a trend towards deterioration, however not statistically significant. One patient experienced a tear of the retinal pigment epithelium after receiving the first injection of aflibercept 8 mg.
conclusionThis retrospective analysis did not show statistically significant changes in central retinal thickness or best-corrected visual acuity after treatment switch from faricimab to aflibercept 8 mg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42891766What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.