ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2026
Surgical resection versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic breast cancer to the liver.
Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comparative evidence for hepatic resection and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in breast cancer liver oligometastases remains limited. We compared survival, progression, and recovery after these treatments. This three-center retrospective study included adults with breast cancer and ≤ 3 liver metastases undergoing hepatic resection or SBRT between 2010 and 2023. Patients with uncontrolled extrahepatic disease were excluded. Propensity score matching generated 1:1 treatment pairs. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Adjusted Cox models evaluated OS and progression-free survival (PFS); progression outcomes were analyzed with death as a competing event. Among 1,055 eligible patients, 708 were matched (354 per group). During a median follow-up of 54.8 months, 432 deaths occurred. Median OS was 48.3 months after surgery and 38.8 months after SBRT (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for SBRT versus surgery, 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.50). Median PFS was 21.8 and 19.7 months, respectively (adjusted HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.96-1.33). The 24 month cumulative incidence of treated-site local failure was 7.1% versus 6.5% (adjusted subdistribution HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.75-1.68). Median hospital stay was 8 versus 1 day; among patients restarting systemic therapy, median restart intervals were 45 versus 18 days. The OS association became less precise in analyses restricted to R0 resection or liver-only disease. Resection was associated with longer OS, while SBRT was associated with shorter hospitalization and treatment interruption. Uncertain differences in PFS and local failure do not establish equivalence. Residual confounding and treatment heterogeneity limit causal interpretation and warrant prospective comparative evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.