ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Pediatric chronological age estimation from pelvic radiographs using deep learning: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPelvic bones exhibit multiple secondary ossification centers during maturation, enabling automated age estimation. This study investigated whether a deep learning model could estimate chronological age from pelvic radiographs across the full pediatric age range. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included pelvic radiographs from two hospitals for model development, from patients aged between 0 and 18 years. A DenseNet161 model was trained to classify age into 19 1-year interval categories using chronological age as a reference standard and conditional ordinal regression (CORN) loss. External validation was conducted using two independent cohorts, including 541 radiographs from a different department of the same hospital and 203 from an external hospital. External validation was performed on 744 radiographs from two independent cohorts. Model performance was evaluated using the accuracy of predictions within 1 year of the chronological age (ACC@dist = 1) and the mean absolute error (MAE).
resultsA total of 3972 radiographs (median age, 2.5 years; interquartile range, 0-8 years; 2463 males) were included in model development. On the internal test set, the model achieved an MAE of 0.394 years (girls: 0.360; boys: 0.419) and an ACC@dist = 1 of 0.937 (girls: 0.944; boys: 0.931). On the external test sets, the corresponding values were 0.513 years (girls, 0.628; boys, 0.455) and 0.927 (girls, 0.896; boys, 0.943), respectively.
conclusionAutomated age estimation in children is feasible from pelvic radiography using a deep neural network. KEY POINTS: Question Pelvic radiographs are commonly obtained in children, yet their potential for automated chronological age estimation across the full pediatric age range remains unexplored. Findings A deep learning model estimated chronological age from pelvic radiographs with a mean absolute error of 0.394 and 0.513 years on internal and external test sets, respectively. Clinical relevance Deep learning-based chronological age estimation from pelvic radiographs is feasible across the full pediatric age range. This approach allows clinically relevant skeletal maturation data to be extracted from imaging already acquired for other indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42891710What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.