Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42891555›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular therapeutics2026

A Logistic Regression Prediction Model for Post-PCI In-Hospital Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Construction and Internal Validation.

Jun Li, Geng Pan, Na Wang, Mei Wu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jun LiDepartment of Cardiology, Chongming Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China, sumhs.edu.cn.
Geng PanDepartment of Interventional Radiology Room, The Lu'an Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, The Lu'an People's Hospital, Lu'an, Anhui, China.
Na WangDepartment of Gynaecology, Chongming Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China, sumhs.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1869-0817
Mei WuDepartment of Cardiology, Chongming Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China, sumhs.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) remains high in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Existing risk prediction tools mostly focus on preoperative baseline indicators and ignore intraoperative interventional parameters, lacking comprehensive postprocedural risk assessment tools for STEMI patients after PCI. This study is aimed at developing and internally validating a logistic regression prediction model for post-PCI in-hospital MACE in STEMI patients based on multidimensional perioperative clinical indicators, so as to realize accurate postoperative risk stratification and guide individualized perioperative management.

methodsWe retrospectively included 1195 STEMI patients who underwent emergency PCI at the Chest Pain Center of Lu'an People's Hospital from January 2019 to October 2024. Patients were randomly divided into training (n = 837) and validation (n = 358) sets at a 7:3 ratio. The primary endpoint was in-hospital MACE (composite of cardiogenic shock, malignant arrhythmias, acute heart failure, reinfarction, or all-cause death). A prediction model was constructed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression combined with multivariate logistic regression. Model discrimination was evaluated via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Head-to-head discriminative comparison with the widely used GRACE and TIMI risk scores was performed using AUC values and the DeLong test to quantify the incremental predictive value of the novel model. Model calibration and clinical utility were assessed via calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis (DCA), with internal validation performed in the validation set.

resultsA total of 260 patients (21.8%) experienced in-hospital MACE. After LASSO regression screening and multivariate logistic regression analysis, eight independent predictors were identified: admission systolic blood pressure, Killip classification, intervention duration, contrast volume, postprocedural TIMI flow grade, culprit vessel occlusion, serum creatinine, and serum potassium. The training set AUC was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.87) with a sensitivity of 77.7% and specificity of 78.2%; the validation set AUC was 0.826 (95% CI: 0.782-0.870). Comparative discriminative analysis showed that the traditional GRACE and TIMI risk scores exhibited moderate predictive performance. The training set AUC of the GRACE score was 0.763 (95% CI: 0.724-0.800), and that of the TIMI score was 0.748 (95% CI: 0.708-0.786). In the validation set, the AUC of the GRACE score and TIMI score were 0.751 (95% CI: 0.699-0.800) and 0.736 (95% CI: 0.683-0.786), respectively. The DeLong test confirmed that our novel model achieved significantly higher discriminative ability than both GRACE and TIMI scores in both training and validation cohorts (all p < 0.05). The training set Brier score was 0.128, with a calibration intercept of 0.042 and calibration slope of 0.991; the validation set Brier score was 0.135, with a calibration intercept of 0.051 and calibration slope of 0.985. After 1000 bootstrap optimism correction, the corrected calibration slope was 0.987 and the corrected intercept was 0.045. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated good model calibration (χ

conclusionThe logistic regression prediction model based on eight clinical indicators demonstrated good discrimination, quantitative calibration, and clinical utility for predicting post-PCI in-hospital MACE in STEMI patients. The model integrates preoperative baseline, intraoperative procedural, and laboratory indicators, achieves stable performance after internal validation, and can assist clinicians in postoperative risk stratification of patients, timely identifying high-risk populations after PCI, and optimizing postoperative perioperative management strategies.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesPercutaneous Coronary InterventionST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionAgedFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment Outcomeacute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctioninternal validationLASSO regressionmajor adverse cardiovascular eventspercutaneous coronary interventionprediction model

Identifiers

PMID42891555
PMCPMC13675940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.